Subjetividad como precepto imperativo de la individualidad digitalizada. Tesis iniciales para interpelar el uso de Inteligencia Artificial generativa en la educación
Cargando...
Archivos
Fecha
Authors
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Facultad de Ciencia Política y Relaciones Internacionales
Resumen
En el umbral del escenario tecnocrático la proliferación de la Inteligencia Artificial generativa (IAg) irrumpe en el campo pedagógico en sentido ambivalente como ocurre con los procesos complejos. La adopción acrítica motiva una reflexión acerca de las ventajas discursivas que configuran el uso de la IAg. La tarea epistemológica inexistente, el reduccionismo informacional prevalente y el embate digital inminente enmarcan diversas tesis que buscan contribuir en tres aspectos: evitar el solapamiento computacional, proponer una reintegración epistémica y apoyar la formación de subjetividades resistentes a adoptar el uso de la IAg en su formación académica. Las tesis ponen el acento en proponer a la promoción acrítica de la IAg la construcción de la subjetividad como condición pedagógica imprescindible para colocarla en su prescindible instrumentalidad.
On the cusp of a technocratic era, the proliferation of Generative Artificial Intelligence is disrupting the field of education in an ambivalent way, as is often the case with complex processes. Its uncritical adoption prompts reflection on the discursive advantages that shape the use of Generative Artificial Intelligence. The lack of an epistemological framework, the prevailing informational reductionism, and the imminent digital onslaught frame various initials theses that seek to contribute in three ways: avoiding computational overlap, proposing an epistemic reintegration, and supporting the formation of subjectivities resistant to adopting the use of Generative Artificial Intelligencein their academic training. These initials theses emphasize the importance of constructing subjectivity as an essential pedagogical condition for addressing the uncritical promotion of Generative Artificial Intelligenceand redefining its dispensable instrumentality.
On the cusp of a technocratic era, the proliferation of Generative Artificial Intelligence is disrupting the field of education in an ambivalent way, as is often the case with complex processes. Its uncritical adoption prompts reflection on the discursive advantages that shape the use of Generative Artificial Intelligence. The lack of an epistemological framework, the prevailing informational reductionism, and the imminent digital onslaught frame various initials theses that seek to contribute in three ways: avoiding computational overlap, proposing an epistemic reintegration, and supporting the formation of subjectivities resistant to adopting the use of Generative Artificial Intelligencein their academic training. These initials theses emphasize the importance of constructing subjectivity as an essential pedagogical condition for addressing the uncritical promotion of Generative Artificial Intelligenceand redefining its dispensable instrumentality.

