Lucha y organización: repensar en la Argentina la historia de la clase obrera y el primer peronismo
Cargando...
Archivos
Fecha
Authors
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Facultad de Ciencia Política y Relaciones Internacionales. Centro Interdisciplinario de Estudios Sociales Argentinos y Latinoamericanos
Resumen
Los estudios históricos y sociales en la Argentina relativos al vínculo entre peronismo y clase obrera han
experimentado un renacimiento durante la última década. Nuevos objetos de indagación, nuevas escalas
de análisis, nuevos sujetos de la acción, han complejizado la descripción de esa relación que fue
fundamental en las primeras investigaciones dedicadas a explicar la emergencia del peronismo y su
perdurable influencia en la clase obrera argentina. La hipótesis de esta revisión bibliográfica sostiene que
las nuevas investigaciones descansan en un paradigma implícito que hace la “lucha” y la “organización”
los pilares de un enfoque conflictivista. Ese enfoque, paradójicamente, disminuye el alcance de las nuevas
investigaciones. A propósito de un dossier destinado a presentar un panorama de las pesquisas recientes
se llama la atención sobre las limitaciones del enfoque de “lucha y organización” y los desafíos
conducentes hacia una renovación real en la investigación sobre un tema crucial para entender la realidad
histórica argentina
Historical and social studies in Argentina on the relation between Peronism and working-class have shown a revival during the last decade. Newly identified areas of research, new scales of analysis, new subjects in relation to collective action, have turned more complex the description of the relation between Peronism and the working-class, which was such a decisive one for the earliest research on this subject. The hypothesis of this bibliographical review is that current research involves an implicit paradigm that makes the “struggle” and “organization” the pillars of a conflictual approach. This approach paradoxically decreases the scope of the research. A recently published dossier intended to offer a panoramic view of recent studies on this subject. Yet, the debates therein are surprisingly limited to firstly, the shortcomings of the “struggle and organization” approach, and secondly, identifying the challenges for a real research innovation regarding this key theme for understanding the Argentinian historical reality.
Historical and social studies in Argentina on the relation between Peronism and working-class have shown a revival during the last decade. Newly identified areas of research, new scales of analysis, new subjects in relation to collective action, have turned more complex the description of the relation between Peronism and the working-class, which was such a decisive one for the earliest research on this subject. The hypothesis of this bibliographical review is that current research involves an implicit paradigm that makes the “struggle” and “organization” the pillars of a conflictual approach. This approach paradoxically decreases the scope of the research. A recently published dossier intended to offer a panoramic view of recent studies on this subject. Yet, the debates therein are surprisingly limited to firstly, the shortcomings of the “struggle and organization” approach, and secondly, identifying the challenges for a real research innovation regarding this key theme for understanding the Argentinian historical reality.
