Evaluación de la trama formativa configurada por los procesos de construcción, apropiación y transferencia de conocimientos articulados con los principios de la agroecología y el pensamiento complejo. El caso del sistema integrado de producciones agroecológicas de la Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias de la Universidad Nacional De Rosario
Fecha
2022-04-18
Autores
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
no disponible
Resumen
El Sistema Integrado de Producciones Agroecológicas (SIPA) de la Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias de la Universidad Nacional de Rosario fue creado en el año 2017 con el objetivo de generar prácticas agropecuarias alternativas que amplíen y mejoren el perfil profesional. Al tiempo que el SIPA comenzaba a funcionar, la institución ya venía interactuando con el Programa de Pensamiento Complejo del Centro de Estudios Interdisciplinarios de la misma universidad con el propósito de integrar la perspectiva de la complejidad en la formación profesional. El objetivo de esta tesis fue evaluar, en el ámbito del SIPA y durante el período 2017-2019, la trama formativa configurada por los procesos de construcción, apropiación y transferencia de conocimientos, articulados con los principios de la agroecología y el pensamiento complejo, así como su influencia sobre el propio SIPA, la institución, el perfil profesional y el contexto agropecuario regional. La metodología cualitativa se basó en el paradigma Hermenéutico Reflexivo y Crítico, aplicando el Estudio de Casos Único. Los datos fueron recabados combinando diferentes técnicas: observación participante, entrevista en profundidad, encuesta de opinión y análisis de documento, y el procesamiento involucró aportes de la Teoría Fundamentada y de la Teoría de Sistemas Complejos. Los resultados permitieron caracterizar la evolución del SIPA considerando seis dimensiones: epistemológica, científica, académica, técnico-productiva, sociopolítica y espiritual, todas fuertemente influenciadas por una transdimensión comunicacional. Se constató que los procesos de construcción, apropiación y transferencia de conocimientos estuvieron permeados por aportes de la agroecología y del pensamiento complejo en la incorporación de conceptos y procedimientos, el abordaje de problemáticas ambientales vinculadas a la intervención del profesional agropecuario, la contextualización cultural, social, política y económica, y la reflexión ética-política sobre las consecuencias de los diversos modelos productivos. También se evidenció que la interacción entre dichos procesos dio lugar a un entramado formativo más adecuado para alcanzar una producción de alimentos sustentable, respetuosa de la naturaleza y de la salud de las comunidades. Por otra parte, se reconocieron componentes que obstaculizaron la evolución del espacio: el predominio de un modelo comunicacional clásico por sobre uno estratégico que influyó negativamente tanto el desarrollo interno como su expansión hacia la región, y la fuerza del paradigma tradicional en la formación de los investigadores y en el sistema científico tecnológico de las instituciones. Por último, se destacan los beneficios del SIPA con respecto a lograr la construcción de un perfil profesional acorde a las nuevas Actividades Reservadas al Título Profesional para las carreras de interés público (Art. 43 de la Ley de Educación Superior N°24.521) que incorporan la responsabilidad profesional con relación a la higiene, seguridad e impacto ambiental.
The Integrated System of Agroecological Productions (SIPA) of the Faculty of Agricultural Sciences of the National University of Rosario was created in 2017 with the aim of generating alternative agricultural practices that broaden and improve the professional profile. At the same time that the SIPA began to operate, the institution was already interacting with the Complex Thought Programme of the Centre for Interdisciplinary Studies of the same university with the aim of integrating the perspective of complexity in professional training. The aim of this thesis was to evaluate, within SIPA and during the period 2017-2019, the formative plot configured by the processes of construction, appropriation and transfer of knowledge, articulated with the principles of agroecology and complex thinking, as well as its influence on SIPA itself, the institution, the professional profile and the regional agricultural context. The qualitative methodology was based on the Reflective and Critical Hermeneutic paradigm, applying the Single Case Study. The data were collected by combining different techniques: participant observation, in-depth interview, opinion survey and document analysis, and the processing involved contributions from Grounded Theory and Complex Systems Theory. The results made it possible to characterize the evolution of the SIPA considering six dimensions: epistemological, scientific, academic, technical-productive, socio-political and spiritual, all strongly influenced by a communicational transdimensión. It was found that the processes of construction, appropriation and transfer of knowledge were permeated by contributions from agroecology and complex thinking in the incorporation of concepts and procedures, the approach to environmental problems linked to the intervention of the agricultural professional, the cultural, social, political and economic contextualization, and the ethical-political reflection on the consequences of the various production models. It was also shown that the interaction between these processes resulted in a more appropriate training framework to achieve sustainable food production, respectful of nature and the health of communities. On the other hand, components that hindered the evolution of the space were recognized: the predominance of a classical communication model over a strategic one that negatively influenced both internal development and its expansion towards the region, and the strength of the traditional paradigm in the training of researchers and in the scientific and technological system of the institutions. Finally, the benefits of the SIPA are highlighted with respect to achieving the construction of a professional profile in accordance with the new Activities Reserved to the Professional Title for careers of public interest (Art. 43 of the Law of Higher Education N°24.521) that incorporate professional responsibility in relation to hygiene, safety and environmental impact.
The Integrated System of Agroecological Productions (SIPA) of the Faculty of Agricultural Sciences of the National University of Rosario was created in 2017 with the aim of generating alternative agricultural practices that broaden and improve the professional profile. At the same time that the SIPA began to operate, the institution was already interacting with the Complex Thought Programme of the Centre for Interdisciplinary Studies of the same university with the aim of integrating the perspective of complexity in professional training. The aim of this thesis was to evaluate, within SIPA and during the period 2017-2019, the formative plot configured by the processes of construction, appropriation and transfer of knowledge, articulated with the principles of agroecology and complex thinking, as well as its influence on SIPA itself, the institution, the professional profile and the regional agricultural context. The qualitative methodology was based on the Reflective and Critical Hermeneutic paradigm, applying the Single Case Study. The data were collected by combining different techniques: participant observation, in-depth interview, opinion survey and document analysis, and the processing involved contributions from Grounded Theory and Complex Systems Theory. The results made it possible to characterize the evolution of the SIPA considering six dimensions: epistemological, scientific, academic, technical-productive, socio-political and spiritual, all strongly influenced by a communicational transdimensión. It was found that the processes of construction, appropriation and transfer of knowledge were permeated by contributions from agroecology and complex thinking in the incorporation of concepts and procedures, the approach to environmental problems linked to the intervention of the agricultural professional, the cultural, social, political and economic contextualization, and the ethical-political reflection on the consequences of the various production models. It was also shown that the interaction between these processes resulted in a more appropriate training framework to achieve sustainable food production, respectful of nature and the health of communities. On the other hand, components that hindered the evolution of the space were recognized: the predominance of a classical communication model over a strategic one that negatively influenced both internal development and its expansion towards the region, and the strength of the traditional paradigm in the training of researchers and in the scientific and technological system of the institutions. Finally, the benefits of the SIPA are highlighted with respect to achieving the construction of a professional profile in accordance with the new Activities Reserved to the Professional Title for careers of public interest (Art. 43 of the Law of Higher Education N°24.521) that incorporate professional responsibility in relation to hygiene, safety and environmental impact.
Descripción
Palabras clave
Formación profesional agropecuaria, Problemáticas ambientales, Universidad