La implacable, escurridiza y fascinante modernidad: Sociología y literatura
Cargando...
Archivos
Fecha
Authors
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
UNR Editora
Resumen
[es] El objetivo del presente escrito es retomar las
contribuciones de escritores y sociólogos acerca
de la anomia, el desarraigo, la alienación y el extrañamiento, tanto en términos generales, como
en sus particularidades inquietantes y hasta perversas. Pretende registrar la intersección entre
las impresiones literarias –horizonte comprensivo que frecuentemente sirve de inspiración a los
científicos sociales– y las conceptualizaciones
sociológicas. A tal fin, se toman algunas pocas
fuentes de ambos campos, de modo de discernir
los rasgos de la distancia moderna entre libertad
y organización e identificar, al mismo tiempo,
los nudos conceptuales de lo que podría llamarse
modernidad tardía, cuestiones que tanto sociólogos como escritores se afanan en dilucidar.
[en] The purpose of this writing is to recapture the contributions of writers and sociologists about anomie, displacement, alienation and estrangement, both in general terms as in their disturbing and even perverse particularities. It intends to register the intersection between literary views –comprehensive horizon that often inspires social scientists– and distictively sociological conceptualizations. To this end, we take a few sources from both fields, so as to discern the features of modern distance between freedom and organization and identify, at the same time, the conceptual knots of what might be called late modernity, issues that both sociologists and writers strive to elucidate.
[en] The purpose of this writing is to recapture the contributions of writers and sociologists about anomie, displacement, alienation and estrangement, both in general terms as in their disturbing and even perverse particularities. It intends to register the intersection between literary views –comprehensive horizon that often inspires social scientists– and distictively sociological conceptualizations. To this end, we take a few sources from both fields, so as to discern the features of modern distance between freedom and organization and identify, at the same time, the conceptual knots of what might be called late modernity, issues that both sociologists and writers strive to elucidate.
