Mito, ideología e inconsciente : orígenes perdidos de la estructura, el sujeto y la historia.
Cargando...
Fecha
Authors
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
UNR Editora
Resumen
Lo que se propone es una lectura comparada entre el mito
lévistrausseano, la ideología marxista y el inconsciente del
psicoanálisis a partir de tres categorías en las que estos tres
campos de inscripción teórica tan diversos podrían, no obstante, aunar un propósito común en el intento de pensar la
subjetividad tras la irremediable muerte del sujeto moderno. Esas tres categorías son: “estructura”, “sujeto” e “historia”.
La hipótesis que motiva tal recorrido es que en todos los
casos se anula como objeto de análisis la relación entre el
fundamento y su origen, por cuanto se introduce un cuestionamiento tanto al estatuto como a la articulación misma
entre lo real y la representación
The proposal is an analysis comparing the Lévi-Strauss myth, the Marx ideology and the unconscious of the psychoanalysis. Starting from these three fields, there are three categories so diverse that they may even have a shared objective regarding thinking the subjectivity following the unavoidable death of the modern subject. These three categories are: ‘structure’, ‘subject’ and ‘history’. The hypothesis is that in all cases the relationship between the ground and its origin is denied as analysis object, since a argue is present in both the statute and the articulation between the real and the representation
The proposal is an analysis comparing the Lévi-Strauss myth, the Marx ideology and the unconscious of the psychoanalysis. Starting from these three fields, there are three categories so diverse that they may even have a shared objective regarding thinking the subjectivity following the unavoidable death of the modern subject. These three categories are: ‘structure’, ‘subject’ and ‘history’. The hypothesis is that in all cases the relationship between the ground and its origin is denied as analysis object, since a argue is present in both the statute and the articulation between the real and the representation
