¿Transferencia de modelos institucionales o redes de asuntos de expertos? : análisis de un préstamo para ciencia y tecnología en Argentina del Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo durante los noventa
Cargando...
Archivos
Fecha
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
CONICET - Facultad de Ciencia Política y Relaciones Internacionales
Resumen
Descripción
Algunos analistas de las políticas de ciencia, tecnología e
innovación (PCTI) resaltaron la relevancia que tuvieron los
organismos internacionales en la creación de instituciones
e instrumentos en América Latina y el Caribe (ALC). Este
trabajo analiza el papel que jugó el Banco Interamericano
de Desarrollo (BID) en las PCTI que intentaron que Argentina construya un Sistema Nacional de Innovación durante
los años noventa. A partir del caso de estudio (el Programa de Modernización Tecnológica I), Argentina se constituyó
en el principal tomador de créditos del BID de ALC para
fi nanciar CTI.
Este trabajo utiliza desarrollos conceptuales recientes del
campo conocido como estudios sobre expertos en políticas
públicas. En particular, se aplica el concepto de redes de
asuntos para analizar el entramado de relaciones e interacciones entre agentes, instituciones y marcos cognitivos
involucrados con los grupos de expertos en un campo de
políticas públicas.
Se concluye que, en las redes de asuntos se producen procesos de circulación de conocimientos, recepción y además
reelaboración de los mismos. Y esos procesos tienen consecuencias en la construcción de las agendas de las PCTI.
Some analysts of policies on Science, Technology and Innovation (PSTI) highlighted the relevance that international financial organizations have had on the creation of institutions and instruments in Latin-America and the Caribbean (LAC). This study analyzes the role played by the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) in the PSTI that tried to build a National Innovation System in Argentina during the nineties. Because of this policy (Technology Upgrading Program I), Argentina became the principal IDB’s loan taker of ALC to finance STI. This study uses recent conceptual advances on the field known as ‘studies about experts on public policies’. In particular, it applies the concept of ‘issue networks’ to analyze the framework of relationships between agents, institutions and cognitive frames involved with groups of experts on a public policy thematic. It concludes that in issue networks occur processes of knowledge movement, reception and also re-elaboration of them. And those processes have consequences on the construction of PSTI agendas.
Some analysts of policies on Science, Technology and Innovation (PSTI) highlighted the relevance that international financial organizations have had on the creation of institutions and instruments in Latin-America and the Caribbean (LAC). This study analyzes the role played by the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) in the PSTI that tried to build a National Innovation System in Argentina during the nineties. Because of this policy (Technology Upgrading Program I), Argentina became the principal IDB’s loan taker of ALC to finance STI. This study uses recent conceptual advances on the field known as ‘studies about experts on public policies’. In particular, it applies the concept of ‘issue networks’ to analyze the framework of relationships between agents, institutions and cognitive frames involved with groups of experts on a public policy thematic. It concludes that in issue networks occur processes of knowledge movement, reception and also re-elaboration of them. And those processes have consequences on the construction of PSTI agendas.
Citación
Aprobación
Revisión
Complementado por
Referenciado por
Licencia Creative Commons
Excepto donde se indique lo contrario, la licencia de este ítem se describe como You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.