De “puentes” y “barreras”: interfaces digitales en la gestión pública
Cargando...
Archivos
Fecha
Authors
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
UNR Editora
Resumen
A partir de una investigación desarrollada en una ciudad
intermedia de la Provincia de Buenos Aires, el presente artículo propone una reflexión acerca de los modos en que la
implementación de un modelo de gestión –el “gobierno electrónico”- marcado por la agenda política trasnacional con
sus articulaciones específicas de capitalismo, democracia
y gestión de los saberes, se superpone a la trama de la fragmentación socioespacial ya existente en el medio local y a la
propia dinámica de la configuración de la identidad urbana.
Planteada como una herramienta para facilitar comunicación
entre gobernantes y gobernados, en sus distintas instancias
de implementación el proceso de digitalización de la gestión
pública presenta paradojas y contradicciones que resultan
desafiantes a la hora de entender los usos y apropiaciones
de las TICs en la comunicación política
The aim of this work was to give an approach to the implementation of “e-government” model management in a middle range city of Buenos Aires Province, Argentina, in a process signed by transnational political agenda with its specific joints of capitalism, democracy and knowledge management. This process is superimposed, also, on the frame of existing social and spatial fragmentation in the local environment and the very dynamics of urban identity configuration. Raised as a tool to facilitate communication between the rulers and the ruled, in its different levels of implementation the digitalization process shows some paradoxes and contradictions that are challenging to understand the uses and appropriations of ICT in political communication
The aim of this work was to give an approach to the implementation of “e-government” model management in a middle range city of Buenos Aires Province, Argentina, in a process signed by transnational political agenda with its specific joints of capitalism, democracy and knowledge management. This process is superimposed, also, on the frame of existing social and spatial fragmentation in the local environment and the very dynamics of urban identity configuration. Raised as a tool to facilitate communication between the rulers and the ruled, in its different levels of implementation the digitalization process shows some paradoxes and contradictions that are challenging to understand the uses and appropriations of ICT in political communication
