Guerra e tradição : os argumentos conservadores em defesa das instituições armadas do Estado brasileiro no período 1964-1988
Cargando...
Archivos
Fecha
Authors
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Facultad de Ciencia Política y Relaciones Internacionales. Centro Interdisciplinario de Estudios Sociales Argentinos y Latinoamericanos
Resumen
Descripción
A lo largo del 2014, una serie de publicaciones, dentro de las cuales se cuenta un informe de la Comisión
Nacional de la Verdad (CNV), conmemoró los cincuenta años del golpe de 1964. La mayoría de
estas iniciativas trataron de comprender las características del régimen autoritario que aún persisten
en el orden democrático que se forjó a partir de la década de 1980. En ese contexto, se habla de
permanencias, restos o continuidades en diversos aspectos de la vida política, social y cultural del
país. El objetivo de este trabajo es comprender las líneas de continuidad y los elementos de ruptura
entre los discursos de legitimación del uso de la violencia por parte del Estado en el período autoritario
(1964-1985). Este afán no se relaciona de forma directa con la permanencia de determinadas
estructuras institucionales, sino con las narrativas construidas en vistas de justificar cierta concepción
del Estado –y, por qué no, de democracia–, que tienen a la violencia como uno de sus elementos centrales.
Para alcanzar este objetivo, el presente trabajo analizará el discurso de los militares envueltos
en la represión política durante el período autoritario, tomando como fuente los testimonios brindados
a la CNV. Esta labor permitirá comprender cuáles son las estrategias discursivas empleadas hasta el
día de hoy para legitimar el uso de la violencia por parte del Estado. Con esto, se pretende identificar
cuáles son los elementos fundamentales de la construcción de una “ideología de la violencia”, pensando
también en la formación de una cultura política que la sustenta y difunde
During 2014, a series of releases, among which there was a report of the Comissão Nacional da Verdade (CNV), marked the 50th anniversary of the 1964 coup d’état. Most of these writings shown an interest in understanding the features of the authoritarian regime that still linger in the democratic order, starting in the 1980s. In this context, we talk about some lingering aspects, remains or continuums, in the country’s political, social and cultural scenes. The aim of this work is to show both the lines of the continuum and the elements that mark a split among the statements that validate the use of violence on behalf of the State during authoritarian times (1964-1985). This work is not directly related with the prevalence of certain institutional structures; instead, it is related with the narratives developed in order to justify a conception of the State –and also, perhaps, of democracy itself–, which put violence at the centre of the agenda. In order to achieve this goal, this work will analyze statements from military personnel involved in political repression throughout the authoritarian era, using as a source the testimonies provided to the CNV. This will help us understand which are the discursive strategies deployed to this day in order to validate the use of violence on behalf of the State. We want to identify the key elements in the development of an ‘ideology of violence’, all while thinking in the formation of a parallel political culture that both sustains and spreads that ideology
During 2014, a series of releases, among which there was a report of the Comissão Nacional da Verdade (CNV), marked the 50th anniversary of the 1964 coup d’état. Most of these writings shown an interest in understanding the features of the authoritarian regime that still linger in the democratic order, starting in the 1980s. In this context, we talk about some lingering aspects, remains or continuums, in the country’s political, social and cultural scenes. The aim of this work is to show both the lines of the continuum and the elements that mark a split among the statements that validate the use of violence on behalf of the State during authoritarian times (1964-1985). This work is not directly related with the prevalence of certain institutional structures; instead, it is related with the narratives developed in order to justify a conception of the State –and also, perhaps, of democracy itself–, which put violence at the centre of the agenda. In order to achieve this goal, this work will analyze statements from military personnel involved in political repression throughout the authoritarian era, using as a source the testimonies provided to the CNV. This will help us understand which are the discursive strategies deployed to this day in order to validate the use of violence on behalf of the State. We want to identify the key elements in the development of an ‘ideology of violence’, all while thinking in the formation of a parallel political culture that both sustains and spreads that ideology
Palabras clave
Citación
Aprobación
Revisión
Complementado por
Referenciado por
Licencia Creative Commons
Excepto donde se indique lo contrario, la licencia de este ítem se describe como Atribución – No Comercial – Compartir Igual (by-nc-sa):
No se permite un uso comercial de la obra original ni de las posibles obras
derivadas, la distribución de las cuales se debe hacer con una licencia igual a
la que regula la obra original