Estado. Política. Locura: aproximaciones a la Nueva Ley de Salud Mental 26.657
Cargando...
Archivos
Fecha
Authors
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Escuela de Trabajo Social. Facultad de Ciencia Política y Relaciones Internacionales. Universidad Nacional de Rosario
Resumen
Descripción
El objetivo de este artículo es apuntar brevemente
los aportes que desde el análisis de políticas
públicas y la reflexión política pueden hacerse a
la Ley de Salud Mental N° 26.657, convencidos de
que su aprobación abre un campo de disputa y
obliga a pensar una batería de políticas públicas
que aporten a la resolución del drama de la locura
en la actualidad. Apuntes que se hacen ubicando
tres elementos del análisis: el Estado, la Política
y la Locura, a través de la comparación de dos
etapas, neoliberalismo y posneoliberalismo en
nuestro país. Pretendemos con ello hacer un
aporte que, desde nuestra especificidad, colabore
a la reflexión y al compromiso con la inaplazable
reforma psiquiátrica que necesita la Argentina,
teniendo como norte la desmanicomialización
The purpose of this article is to briefly point out the contributions public policy analysis and policy reflections can make to the understanding of Mental Health Law N° 26.657, as we are convinced that the law's approval opens a disputed field and requires us to think of a public policy Program that contributes to the resolution of current Psychiatrical problems. These points are made from three elements of analysis: the State, Politics and Madness, from a comparison between neoliberalism and post-neoliberalism in our country. We intend to make a contribution to our discipline that collaborates reflection and commitment with the urgent need of psychiatric reform in Argentina, using deinstitutionalization as a guide.
The purpose of this article is to briefly point out the contributions public policy analysis and policy reflections can make to the understanding of Mental Health Law N° 26.657, as we are convinced that the law's approval opens a disputed field and requires us to think of a public policy Program that contributes to the resolution of current Psychiatrical problems. These points are made from three elements of analysis: the State, Politics and Madness, from a comparison between neoliberalism and post-neoliberalism in our country. We intend to make a contribution to our discipline that collaborates reflection and commitment with the urgent need of psychiatric reform in Argentina, using deinstitutionalization as a guide.