Del refugio a la migración forzada : análisis de las perspectivas jurídicas y críticas en la gobernanza de la movilidad internacional
Cargando...
Archivos
Fecha
Authors
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Facultad de Ciencia Política y Relaciones Internacionales
Resumen
Este artículo propone un enfoque integrador entre la perspectiva jurídica del refugio y la visión crítica de la migración forzada, a fin de repensar la gobernanza de la movilidad internacional desde una perspectiva multidimensional. Mediante un análisis teórico y una revisión histórica de ambos marcos, se argumenta que, aunque el sistema de asilo/refugio, basado en documentos como la Convención de Ginebra de 1951, se limita a situaciones específicas de persecución, el concepto de migración forzada amplía la comprensión del desplazamiento humano, considerando causas estructurales como las políticas neoliberales y los conflictos internacionales. El artículo destaca que la intersección de estos enfoques es no solo posible, sino necesaria, para abordar las desigualdades estructurales en la protección de los migrantes y para entender la movilidad internacional como un proceso complejo impulsado por factores políticos, económicos y sociales. Los hallazgos principales incluyen la necesidad de replantear las soluciones jurídicas y la urgencia de integrar ambos marcos para una mayor comprensión de las realidades migratorias contemporáneas.
This article proposes an integrative approach between the legal perspective of asylum and the critical view of forced migration, aiming to rethink the governance of international mobility from a multidimensional perspective. Through a theoretical analysis and historical review of both frameworks, it argues that, while the asylum/refugee system, based on documents like the 1951 Geneva Convention, is limited to specific persecution cases, the concept of forced migration broadens the understanding of human displacement by addressing structural causes such as neoliberal policies and international conflicts. The article highlights that the intersection of these approaches is not only possible but necessary to address the structural inequalities in migrant protection and to understand international mobility as a complex process driven by political, economic, and social factors. The main findings include the need to rethink legal solutions and the urgency of integrating both frameworks for a deeper understanding of contemporary migration realities.
This article proposes an integrative approach between the legal perspective of asylum and the critical view of forced migration, aiming to rethink the governance of international mobility from a multidimensional perspective. Through a theoretical analysis and historical review of both frameworks, it argues that, while the asylum/refugee system, based on documents like the 1951 Geneva Convention, is limited to specific persecution cases, the concept of forced migration broadens the understanding of human displacement by addressing structural causes such as neoliberal policies and international conflicts. The article highlights that the intersection of these approaches is not only possible but necessary to address the structural inequalities in migrant protection and to understand international mobility as a complex process driven by political, economic, and social factors. The main findings include the need to rethink legal solutions and the urgency of integrating both frameworks for a deeper understanding of contemporary migration realities.

