Paradojas de ciudadanía y conflictos de género en la política pública argentina. La Política de Salud Sexual y Procreación Responsable
Archivos
Fecha
2009-12
Autores
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Facultad de Ciencia Política y Relaciones Internacionales, Universidad Nacional de Rosario
Resumen
El artículo analiza el alcance del vínculo jurídico político establecido entre Estado y ciudadanas desde las garantías reconocidas en los
derechos humanos sexuales y reproductivos.
Utilizando un enfoque complejo, que combina
diferentes dimensiones de análisis, interesa mostrar cómo y porqué las decisiones sobre la naturaleza jurídica de estos derechos y sobre su regulación política producen efectos disímiles en ese
campo: desarrollo, interferencia o limitaciones
de ciudadanía. Nuestra argumentación principal refiere al conflicto político que desatan esas
decisiones y a los fundamentos antagónicos de
las posiciones que los registran como derechos
sociales de salud o como derechos individuales
de libertad. En esas opciones se involucran con
distinta intensidad los componentes constitutivos de la ciudadanía: la autonomía, la libertad
y la igualdad. La intención es señalar que tanto
el derecho como la política y la teología al fijar las “reglas de juego” en la sociedad buscan
disciplinar los intereses existentes regulando el
conflicto.
This article analyses the scope of the judicial and political link between the State and womencitizens, observing this from the guarantees recognized in the sexual and reproductive human rights. Using a complex analysis that combines different dimensions, this article tries to show how and why the decisions about the juridical nature of these rights and about its political regulation cause dissimilar effects: develop, interference or limitation of citizenship. The core of our argumentation is the political conflict that these decisions cause and the antagonist argumentations of the positions that registries them as social health rights or as freedom individuals rights. The problem is that in these options are different forms and ways to understand the constitutive components of citizenship: autonomy, freedom and equality. Finally, we are trying to show that law, politics, and theology fix in society “the rules of the game”, trying in this way to discipline existing interests and regulating conflict.
This article analyses the scope of the judicial and political link between the State and womencitizens, observing this from the guarantees recognized in the sexual and reproductive human rights. Using a complex analysis that combines different dimensions, this article tries to show how and why the decisions about the juridical nature of these rights and about its political regulation cause dissimilar effects: develop, interference or limitation of citizenship. The core of our argumentation is the political conflict that these decisions cause and the antagonist argumentations of the positions that registries them as social health rights or as freedom individuals rights. The problem is that in these options are different forms and ways to understand the constitutive components of citizenship: autonomy, freedom and equality. Finally, we are trying to show that law, politics, and theology fix in society “the rules of the game”, trying in this way to discipline existing interests and regulating conflict.
Descripción
Palabras clave
Ciudadanía, Derechos sexuales y reproductivos, Políticas públicas, Conflicto político, Libertad, Citizenship, Sexual and reproductive rights, political conflict, Public policies, Liberty