2019-09-122019-09-1220192314-2634http://hdl.handle.net/2133/16126Este artículo analiza la política exterior del tercer gobierno peronista (1973-1975) y de la dictadura militar (1976-1983) en organismos multilaterales con relación a un problema en particular: la situación de los exiliados políticos y, más especialmente, los refugiados del Cono Sur en el país. Desde finales de 1973 en adelante, la cuestión de los refugiados en Argentina adquirió una notable complejidad. La presencia de chilenos y latinoamericanos interpelaba al Estado desde lugares distintos, incluso, antagónicos. Así, las políticas de población convivieron con los enfoques de “seguridad nacional” y “guerra antisubversiva” que transformó a los recién llegados en potenciales “enemigos”. Desde el punto de vista de la política exterior, la cuestión de los refugiados fue desde el inicio una cuestión de “guerra” por la imagen del país. En este trabajo, nos proponemos examinar los usos políticos que hicieron los diplomáticos argentinos sobre los refugiados en un período atravesado por la violencia organizada en el marco del denominado Plan Cóndor (1975-1978) que colocó, a la Argentina y al resto de las dictaduras de la región, en el foco de la mirada de los organismos internacionales que vigilaban el cumplimiento de los derechos humanos.This article analyzes the foreign policy of the third Peronist government (1973-1975) and the military dictatorship (1976-1983) in multilateral organizations in relation to a particular problem: the situation of the exiles and, more especially, refugees from the Southern Cone in the country. From the end of 1973 onwards the question of refugees in Argentina acquired a remarkable complexity from the point of view of the State. The presence of Chileans and other Latin American nationalities exiles questioned the State from different places, even antagonistic. Thus, population policies coexisted with the approaches of “national security” and “antisubversive warfare” that transformed newcomers into potential “enemies”. From the point of view of foreign policy, the question of refugees was from the beginning a question of “war” for the image of the country. In this paper we propose to examine the political uses made by Argentine diplomats on the question of refugees in a period crossed by organized violence in the framework of the Condor Plan, which placed Argentina and the rest of the dictatorships in the region in the focus of the international agencies that monitored the fulfillment of human rights.application/pdf175-196spaopenAccessDiplomaciaRefugiadosDerechos humanosArgentinaDictadura militarDiplomacyHuman rightsarticleAutor y ESE. Estudios Sociales del EstadoYou are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes. ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.