2017-11-252017-11-252016-112171-8695http://hdl.handle.net/2133/9405Resumen Objetivo: Evaluar la prescripción de medicamentos oncológicos de la Red de Salud Pública Municipal de Rosario según su adecuación las guías de práctica clínica. Método: Estudio farmacoepidemiológico descriptivo en pacientes adultos en un Servicio Oncológico. Enero-junio 2012. Se evaluó la adecuación de las prescripciones a las guías de práctica clínica de referencia. Resultados: El 51,8 % de los diagnósticos tuvo al menos un medicamento prescripto que no coincidía con lo recomendado por al menos una de las guías consideradas. Las prescripciones de doxorrubicina e ifosfamida no coincidieron con lo recomendado por ninguna guía. El 5,4% de las prescripciones no estaban consideradas en las guías locales, el 7,7% no lo estaban en las nacionales y, respecto de las internacionales, el 4,2 % no estaban consideradas en la European Society for Medical Oncology, el 2,3% por el American Cancer Society y solo el 1,9% por la National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Conclusiones: La prescripción de oncológicos se adecúa más a las guías internacionales. Podría deberse a que no existe aún una definición estándar en el manejo de las patologías tumorales por parte del Estado Nacional.Abstract Objective: To assess prescription of oncology medications in municipal public health network of Rosario for its appropriateness to clinical practice guidelines. Methods: Descriptive pharmacoepidemiological study in adult patients in an Oncology Service between January and June 2012. Compliance requirements with clinical practice guidelines were evaluated. Results: 51.8% of diagnoses had at least one prescription medication that did not match recommendation by at least one of the guides considered. Prescriptions of doxorrubicine and ifosfamide did not agree with the recommendation of any reference guides. 5.4% of prescriptions weren´t considered by local guides, nor 7.7% by national on es. Regarding comparison with international guidelines: 4.2% of prescriptions weren ´t considered by the European Society for Medical Oncology guidelines, 2.3% not considered by the American Cancer Society and only 1.9% were not considered by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network ones. Conclusions: Prescription of oncology treatments is closer to international reference guides. One reason could be that there is still no standard definition in the management of tumor diseases by the National State.application/pdf491-495spaopenAccessMedicamentos oncológicosFarmacoepidemiologíaGuía de practica clínicaOncology medicationClinical practice guidelinePharmacoepidemiologyarticleSociedad Española de Farmacia HospitalariaPalchik, ValeriaTraverso, María LuzColautti, MariselBianchi, MarielaDolza, LucíaCatena, José MaríaSalamano, MercedesAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes. NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.