2023-12-202023-12-202023-071853-8827https://hdl.handle.net/2133/26632Estos trazos pretenden establecer cuáles fueron los desafíos del agenciamiento feminista en Argentina, para garantizar el derecho a la salud de las mujeres en contextos de administraciones conservadoras. En este sentido, nos proponemos describir el vínculo entre las prácticas sanitarias androcéntricas y la negación de las libertades sexuales y (no)reproductivas, en períodos en los que los estilos de gestión se constituyeron de ciertos ejes preponderantes, tales como, la búsqueda de conservar un ordenamiento social y la defensa de cierto tipo de tradiciones presentes en las representaciones societales. Partiremos de suponer que, desde inicios del siglo XX hasta el presente primaron los proyectos tradicionalistas con rasgos liberales clásicos y neoliberales, donde prevaleció el resguardo de un conjunto de creencias y la estratificación social. De esta manera, el presente trabajo trata de buscar respuestas a partir del análisis de fuentes bibliográficas, analizando el vínculo entre los cimientos institucionales de las primeras décadas del siglo XX y las injusticias generadas en el marco del desarrollo de las lógicas neoliberales.These outlines aim to establish what were the challenges of feminist agency in Argentina, to guarantee the right to health of women in contexts of conservative administrations. In this sense, we propose to describe the link between androcentric health practices and the denial of sexual and (non) reproductive freedoms, in periods in which management styles were constituted of certain preponderant axes, such as the search to preserve a social order and the defense of certain types of traditions present in societal representations. We will start from assuming that, from the beginning of the twentieth century to the present, traditionalist projects with classical and neoliberal liberal features prevailed, where the protection of a set of beliefs and social stratification prevailed. In this way, the present work tries to find answers from the analysis of bibliographic sources, analyzing the link between the institutional foundations of the first decades of the twentieth century and the injustices generated in the framework of the development of neoliberal logics.esopenAccessDerechos reproductivos y (no) reproductivosConservadurismoNeoliberalismoMujeresGéneroFeminismoarticuloAutores y Facultad de Ciencia Política y Relaciones InternacionalesAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes . ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits. Notices: You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation . No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.