El estudio de los sindicatos en la Ciencia Política argentina
Archivos
Fecha
2013
Autores
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Facultad de Ciencia Política y Relaciones Internacionales - Universidad Nacional de Rosario
Resumen
Descripción
[es] Los sindicatos no constituyen un objeto privilegiado
de estudio de la Ciencia Política argentina,
y cuando se los estudia es con relación a sus
vínculos con el Estado. Esta definición epistemológica
hace que los enfoques hegemónicos
sobre el sindicalismo sean el pluralismo y el
corporativismo.
En este trabajo proponemos revisar críticamente
las investigaciones realizadas en Argentina
desde tales enfoques. Para ello en primer lugar
vamos a reseñar las interpretaciones acerca del
sindicalismo argentino en tres momentos (postguerra,
década del ‘90, postcrisis de 2001), para
finalmente hacer un balance de las mismas, señalado
sus aportes y debilidades.
Entre los aportes destacamos el desarrollo teó-
rico y empírico de las categorías del corporativismo
para abordar la relación entre Estado y
sindicatos en Argentina. Como debilidades advertimos
que subvalúan el eje capital-trabajo en
una determinada formación social, lo cual impide
captar en su complejidad y especificidad las
estrategias sindicales
[en] Unions are not a privileged object of study in Political Science in Argentina, and when they have been studied it was in relation to the State. Because of this epistemological definition, hegemonic approaches on trade unionism are pluralism and corporatism. We propose to review critically the research conducted in Argentina from such approaches. To do this we will first review the interpretations of Argentine trade unionism in three stages (postwar, ‘90s, post-crisis of 2001), to finally evaluate them, note their contributions and weaknesses. Among the contributions highlight the theoretical development of the categories of corporatism and its use to address empirically the relationship between State and trade unions. As weaknesses we note that sub-valued capital-labor axis in a social formation, prevents capture in their complexity and specificity union strategies.
[en] Unions are not a privileged object of study in Political Science in Argentina, and when they have been studied it was in relation to the State. Because of this epistemological definition, hegemonic approaches on trade unionism are pluralism and corporatism. We propose to review critically the research conducted in Argentina from such approaches. To do this we will first review the interpretations of Argentine trade unionism in three stages (postwar, ‘90s, post-crisis of 2001), to finally evaluate them, note their contributions and weaknesses. Among the contributions highlight the theoretical development of the categories of corporatism and its use to address empirically the relationship between State and trade unions. As weaknesses we note that sub-valued capital-labor axis in a social formation, prevents capture in their complexity and specificity union strategies.
Palabras clave
Sindicalismo, Ciencia política, Argentina, Estado, Trade unionism, Political science, State