Las competencias geopolíticas de Nicaragua, Honduras, Colombia y Costa Rica por su territorio ante la Corte Internacional de Justicia
Archivos
Fecha
2019-07
Autores
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
UNR Editora
Resumen
Descripción
El análisis se centra en las competencias geopolíticas por territorio ante la Corte Internacional de
Justicia, que involucran a Nicaragua, Honduras,
Colombia y Costa Rica con respecto a sus límites internacionales. Para aquello, dos secciones
componen el artículo: primero, la discusión teórica del concepto territorio de Stuart Elden, más
la propuesta metodológica de análisis; segundo,
las demandas de los Estados seleccionados y las
sentencias de la Corte. Los resultados muestran
que las competencias geopolíticas por el territorio incluyen tierra y mar; que los Estados
replican un rol cuando tienen el estatus de demandante, ocurriendo lo mismo cuando son demandados; que la Corte sentencia mediante votación, sin aceptar tesis maximalistas y usando
la cartografía para representar el territorio; y por
último, que la territorialización es un proceso
continuo.
The analysis focuses on the geopolitical competitions by territory before the International Court of Justice, which involve Nicaragua, Honduras, Colombia and Costa Rica concerning their international boundaries. For that, two sections make up the article: first, the theoretical discussion of the concept of territory of Stuart Elden and the methodological proposal of analysis; second, the demands of the selected States and the judgments of the Court. The results show that geopolitical competitions for the territory include land and sea; the states replicate the role when they are applicants and defendant; the sentence of the Court are by vote, without using maximalist thesis and using cartography; and finally, the territorialization is a continuous process.
The analysis focuses on the geopolitical competitions by territory before the International Court of Justice, which involve Nicaragua, Honduras, Colombia and Costa Rica concerning their international boundaries. For that, two sections make up the article: first, the theoretical discussion of the concept of territory of Stuart Elden and the methodological proposal of analysis; second, the demands of the selected States and the judgments of the Court. The results show that geopolitical competitions for the territory include land and sea; the states replicate the role when they are applicants and defendant; the sentence of the Court are by vote, without using maximalist thesis and using cartography; and finally, the territorialization is a continuous process.
Palabras clave
Geopolítica, Nicaragua, Honduras, Colombia, Costa Rica, Corte Internacional de Justicia, Geopolitics