Interdependencia global y democracia disfuncional en Paraguay
Archivos
Fecha
2013
Autores
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Universidad Nacional de Rosario. Facultad de Humanidades y Artes. Escuela de Historia
Resumen
Descripción
La destitución de Fernando Lugo como producto de la conflictividad social resulta paradójica ya que su gobierno avanzó en la inclusión de los sectores vulnerables. La decisión parlamentaria para efectuar un precipitado Juicio político refuerza el tradicional bipartidismo paraguayo en detrimento de la representación política de los sectores disidentes. Pero esta actitud resulta anacrónica y peligrosa en el actual contexto de Interdependencia global donde los países socios tienen mucho que decir sobre la calidad de la democracia de sus países miembros. El peligro principal recae sobre el tipo de democracia que en lugar de fomentar la representación política de la pluralidad cierra las posibilidades a la negociación de la democracia consensual y abre la puerta a la conflictividad social.
The dismissal of Fernando Lugo as a result of, social conflict seems paradoxical since his government made advances in the inclusion of vulnerable sectors. The parliamentary decision to carry out a hasty impeachment reinforces the traditional Paraguayan bipartisanship detrimental to the political representation of dissident sectors. But that attitudes seems anachronistic and dangerous in the current context of global interdependence where partner countries have a lot to say about the quality of democracy of their member states. The principal danger lies in the type of democracy which, instead of encouraging the plurality of political representation, closes those possibilities with regards to the negotiation of consensual democracy and opens the door to social conflict.
The dismissal of Fernando Lugo as a result of, social conflict seems paradoxical since his government made advances in the inclusion of vulnerable sectors. The parliamentary decision to carry out a hasty impeachment reinforces the traditional Paraguayan bipartisanship detrimental to the political representation of dissident sectors. But that attitudes seems anachronistic and dangerous in the current context of global interdependence where partner countries have a lot to say about the quality of democracy of their member states. The principal danger lies in the type of democracy which, instead of encouraging the plurality of political representation, closes those possibilities with regards to the negotiation of consensual democracy and opens the door to social conflict.
Palabras clave
Democracia, Desigualdad, Institucionalidad, Estado, Democracy, Inequality, Institutional